Mining & Extraction

Recover what your circuit leaves behind. Start with an ore test.

Send us a sample of your ore. KST Mining Canada, in Québec, runs a bench-scale flotation comparison and sends you a written result. Kairospace has no mining installations yet; the ore test is how we start.

Leaching instead of flotation? Run the heap-leach numbers

Up to −50%
Collector and frother demand
(Ore- and circuit-specific · published research)
+16–21%
Fine-particle recovery
(Lab scale, narrow fine chalcopyrite cuts, not a plant feed · published research)
25–50%
Faster flotation completion
(Phosphate trials, k 1.01 → 1.89 min⁻¹ · published research)
The ore test

What an ore test is

A bench-scale comparison, treated against untreated, on your own ore. It is run by KST Mining Canada (Québec), led by Steve Coulombe.

  • You sendA representative ore sample, your current reagent scheme and the recovery you get today, and the particle size of the feed.
  • You getA written comparison at bench scale, treated against untreated on the same ore: recovery by size fraction, collector and frother dosage, and flotation kinetics.
  • Who runs itKST Mining Canada, in Québec, led by Steve Coulombe.
  • What it settlesWhether ultrafine bubbles move recovery or reagent use on your ore, and whether clay in the ore works against you. It is a bench result, not plant performance.
  • Sample, timeline, costSample size, timeline and cost are set out in the proposal that answers your request.
  • After the testIf the comparison supports it, a scoped proposal for a pilot on your circuit; pilot fees can credit toward the full system, up to 100% on structured trials. If not, you keep the data.
Request an ore testWhatsApp an engineerAn engineer replies within 48 hours, with a proposal or with the questions we need to write one.
The problem

Valuable minerals are leaving in your tailings

Fine and ultrafine particles are invisible to standard flotation bubbles. They slip through your circuit and end up in tailings, taking your revenue with them. Every ton of unrecovered mineral is revenue that does not come back.

The solution

Bubbles small enough to find the fines

Ultrafine bubbles attach directly to fine mineral surfaces and form aggregates that standard bubbles can lift. In published flotation research that raised recovery on fine size cuts, lowered collector and frother demand, and sped up kinetics. The record is ore-specific, so the first step is a test on your ore, not a proposal.

Heap leaching

Oxygen is a reactant in the leach, and many barren solutions run short of it

Gold dissolves by the Elsner reaction, 4 Au + 8 CN⁻ + O₂ + 2 H₂O → 4 Au(CN)₂⁻ + 4 OH⁻, so oxygen is consumed alongside cyanide, and in published research the leach runs best near a cyanide-to-oxygen ratio of about 6:1 by mass. Many barren solutions carry less dissolved oxygen than that ratio asks for, which is one reason the same ore can leach slower on the pad than in the bottle roll.

The response is saturating, not proportional: past the point where oxygen stops limiting, more of it buys nothing. The heap-leach calculator is built on that curve; if your circuit already sits at the cyanide-to-oxygen optimum it returns zero and says oxygen is not your limit. It does not model flotation.

Buyer questions

What buyers in mining ask before an ore test

Is this for flotation or for heap leaching?

Both, but they are two different unit operations, and the evidence for one does not carry to the other. In flotation, ultrafine bubbles attach to fine particles; in published flotation research that cut collector and frother demand by up to 50%, ore- and circuit-specific. In heap leaching, oxygen is an Elsner reactant, and the heap-leach calculator models a saturating response: if your circuit already sits at the cyanide-to-oxygen optimum, it returns no gain and says oxygen is not your limit.

Does Kairospace have mining installations?

No. Kairospace has no mining installations and no measurement of its own in this application, which is why the first step is a test on your ore, run by KST Mining Canada in Québec and led by Steve Coulombe.

How does it tie into our circuit?

The injector mounts inline on existing piping, so the tie-in is a pipe connection rather than a new cell. Where it goes in your circuit follows from what the ore test shows, and the proposal specifies it along with the power circuit (a dedicated GFCI-protected circuit, commonly about 220 V / 30 A) and the mounting area for the skid. Installation itself takes 1–3 days, with hours of interruption on the treated line, not days.

What happens after the test?

You get the written comparison either way. If it supports a pilot, the next step is a scoped proposal for a pilot on your circuit, and pilot fees can credit toward the full system, up to 100% on structured trials. How a pilot works. If it does not, you keep the data and stop there.

Research

What published research reports

Figures are from published studies, not Kairospace measurements. Results depend on the ore and the circuit, which is what the ore test is for.

Ultrafine minerals are slipping through your circuit
The problem: Fine and ultrafine particles (<20 μm) don't collide with standard bubbles efficiently: they pass right through your flotation cell and end up in tailings as lost revenue. Ahmadi et al., 2014
What the research reports: Ultrafine bubbles bridge hydrophobic surfaces and build aggregates from fine particles that standard bubbles can lift. In chalcopyrite trials, recovery rose 16–21% for the finest fractions.
Your chemical bill is eating your margins
The problem: Conventional flotation requires heavy collector and frother dosages to reach acceptable recoveries, which drives up operating cost and environmental footprint. Peng & Yu, 2015
What the research reports: Ultrafine bubbles act as a secondary collector by raising surface hydrophobicity. In published coal and phosphate work, reagent use dropped by up to 50% while grade held or improved. It is a reduction, not a replacement for the reagent program, and it is not a dosage another operation can adopt.
Clay is coating your valuable minerals
The problem: Clay minerals coat the surfaces of your valuable minerals, blocking collectors from attaching and preventing bubble pickup. The result is poor recovery and wasted reagent.
What the research reports: In published coal-flotation work, cavitation shockwaves loosened clay coatings and combustible recovery rose. The record is ore-specific, not uniform: on a high-clay copper ore, nanobubbles intensified slime coatings and reduced recovery. Clay chemistry decides, so we test your ore first. Ramírez-Madrid et al., 2025
Coarse particles keep falling off your bubbles
The problem: Large particles (>150 μm) detach from bubbles because of their weight and cell turbulence, which limits recovery in the rougher stage. Rosa & Rubio, 2018
What the research reports: Ultrafine bubbles form a stable coating on coarse particle surfaces, which strengthens attachment. In published work on coarse quartz, recovery rose measurably. Nazari et al., 2022
Flotation is too slow for your throughput targets
The problem: Slow bubble-particle attachment means longer residence times, oversized tanks and higher energy cost, all of which limit throughput. Chipakwe et al., 2022
What the research reports: Ultrafine bubbles speed up attachment kinetics. In phosphate flotation the rate constant nearly doubled (1.01 to 1.89 min⁻¹), which allowed completion 25–50% faster. Tao, 2022